Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 - Wikipedia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:WikiProject Pakistan has switches for provincial wiki project banners. This template is not needed, no other Pakistani provincial WP has a separate banner template, if we take an example of WP India, same is true there as well. This is a prematurely created template and should be deleted. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- As a standlone project it's valid for it to have a project banner. I'd personally send Wikipedia:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to MfD as a dead project with zero activity instead of merging anything. If it really needs to exist, then it should still be sent to MfD to convert it to a task force (but with no activity, there is really no point). Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not in favor of submitting the project to MfD. The project pertains to one of Pakistan's four administrative units. I'm unsure how activity is measured, but I recently tagged over a hundred articles with the project. Regarding the template, I am an active member of both WP Pakistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. I support managing it as one of the switches under Template:WikiProject Pakistan, and I have been handling it this way. Therefore, a separate banner template is unnecessary. As an active project member, I am stating that we do not wish to manage the banner using a separate template. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, not needed. if someone wants to convert the project to a task force, or send the project to TfD, please feel free. but, for this discussion, the banner isn't needed (already a part of the WP Pakistan banner). Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, template documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in early 2024. There are about thirty of these unused maps. They should either be used or deleted. If this discussion is closed as delete, I'll be happy to nominate the others, but I'd rather not bother Spesh531 with thirty nominations yet. See this discussion on the creator's talk page for some background. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- So when these were made, I initially added them to all the MLB season pages. Due to how the standings tables were formatted at the time, there were large empty gaps in the page due to the maps. Given the updated standings table format, adding maps does not involve adding large empty gaps... so I've re-added the maps via WP:BOLD. I get the feeling some (or all) the map templates will be removed, but in the meantime, all thirty or so unused maps are now being used (again). Spesh531(talk, contrib., ext.) 04:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it is now used, again. However, if this or others from this set are removed once again, I'd be extremely opposed to it being re-added again to any article to save it from deletion. If the community does not want it, then it does not want it. Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Only two links and both are not in the squad anymore. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Not unused anymore after update and does not qualify for current deletion policies. Being the top league and professional club, but mostly considering the local media interest in football, makes atleast half the squad pass GNG (if talking about #3 likelihood of being used). Best to skip this and move to next discussion. Pelmeen10 (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- First create the articles, then create a navigation template that provides navigation between articles. Even after your edits this still only has one player with an article, which still makes this template in its current form pointless. Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Still not a reason to delete. In some cases templates are kept even without usages. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- First create the articles, then create a navigation template that provides navigation between articles. Even after your edits this still only has one player with an article, which still makes this template in its current form pointless. Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - useless, not needed. GiantSnowman 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:USM Blida squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused and mostly blanked template. Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on quick search, could not find a squad list for them. That being said, most Algerian third tier footballers won't be notable, and looking at List of USM Blida players, most of their players historically haven't been notable. Unless someone finds a squad list and their current squad contains 4-5 notable players (all of which seems unlikely to me), then this should be deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - useless, not needed. GiantSnowman 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.