[Foundation-l] Reply to Mark
Article Images
Oldak Quill
oldakquill at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 23:51:39 UTC 2008
More information about the foundation-l mailing list
Tue Feb 26 23:51:39 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [Foundation-l] Reply to Mark
- Next message: [Foundation-l] Reply to Mark
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 26/02/2008, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote: > Let's be clear: you killfiled a thread critical of the foundation, > that was ongoing and was at present constructive and unoffensive (with > any nastiness long since past), that was being responded to by > Florence, and was relevant to this list. This is the kind of heavy- > handed moderation that brings up allegations of censorship. Please be > more hands-off and not step in with moderation when there is no problem. > > > -Dan > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Austin Hair wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> > > wrote: > >> For unclear reasons my reply below was blocked. I am thus re- > >> sending it. > > > > I did killfile this thread, as it any utility it had as a constructive > > discussion had long since ended. Many of the lingering posts were, > > frankly, offensive. > > > > If you'd like to address the criteria for selecting the Wikimania > > venue, please bring it up constructively in a separate thread, > > preferably on wikimania-l. As Ray says, condemning a decision made > > well in the past is, if anything, counterproductive to the current > > team's organization efforts. And if the killfile was legitimate, why didn't you tell anyone until 15 hours after you did it? Quite a few list regulars were involved, it seems like basic respect to tell them that you did this. -- Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)
- Previous message: [Foundation-l] Reply to Mark
- Next message: [Foundation-l] Reply to Mark
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the foundation-l mailing list