Talk:Lintel - Wikipedia

At some point the content here may have been merged to Talk:Post and lintel.

I removed the following, because I do not think it is an example of a lintel and/or its stated weight is wrong:

An example from the Mycenaean Greece cultural period (c. 1600 – 1100 BCE) is the Treasury of Atreus in Mycenae, Greece. It weighs 120 tons, with approximate dimensions 8.3 × 5.2 × 1.2 m,^[1] one of the largest in the world.

First of all, I am not sure I believe a block of stone of dimensions 8.3 × 5.2 × 1.2 m would weigh that much. Maybe that would be a huge block of stone, like maybe that could weigh that much. But, are the dimensions of the relevant lintel (shown in photo at right) actually that large, or is the lintel there much smaller, perhaps 8.3 x 5.2 x 1.2 feet instead?

Second, the Treasury of Atreus article currently mentions a 1,200 ton weight for the entrance, perhaps termed an architrave, but that consists of an entire domed structure, not just a single lintel. Was "120 ton" an editing mistake misrepresenting the actual 1,200 ton weight, and also assuming the weight of the lintel alone was that of the whole entrance structure?

I also modified the article to clarify that the term "architrave" may refer to a lintel, but that the term has other (larger) meanings. Perhaps there is a source that says the architrave of the Treasury of Atreus is estimated to weigh 120 or 1,200 tons, and perhaps there are sources saying that an architrave is a lintel, which it may be in some cases, in some usage. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 05:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The cited source covers the Treasury of Atreus in its Chapter VI, with mention on its page 230 that the entranceway (I think the one in photo here) is 20 feet wide, with an entrance itself that is seven feet ten inches wide at the top.

A space of twenty feet in width between two walls leads to the entrance, which is nine feet and a half wide at the base, and seven feet ten inches at top, and about nineteen feet1 in height, and leads by a passage of eighteen feet in depth, to the subterraneous circular chamber, which is in the form of a Gothic dome, terminating at top in a point or key stone.

So 8.3 x 5.2 x 1.2 feet rather than meters seems more plausible as size of the lintel here.

But, hmm, on page 233 is an account of a "gigantic stone", of breccia, which is one part of a lintel (where, perhaps at the entrance to a main chamber inside?):

The lintel of the door is composed of two masses of stone, the largest of which is of the surprising dimensions of twenty-seven feet in length, seventeen feet in breadth, and three feet nine inches in thickness, the specific gravity of which must be about one hundred and thirty-three tons. No masses* except those of Egypt and Balbec, can be compared with this gigantic stone, which is of the same material as the rest of the building.

Using the {{convert}} too to checking conversions from feet to meters: 27 feet (8.2 m), 17 feet (5.2 m), and 3.75 feet (1.14 m), so that would be "8.3 x 5.2 x 1.14 m", not far off from "8.3 x 5.2 x 1.2 m" that was stated in the article. I would have thought that the term "specific gravity" would refer to a density measure, say pounds per cubic foot or tons per cubic meter; the term specific gravity in wikipedia refers to a ratio of densities; in context here the author seems to be using it to mean simply the weight, presumably computed by multiplying the usual density of breccia times the estimated volume of the lintel, with result in some type of ton measure (long ton or short ton or metric ton?). His estimate of 133 tons could correspond to 120 tons of some other type?

The source, published in 1819, is about Edward Dodwell's trips in 1801, 1805, and 1806, and I don't think that would be definitive about this one being the largest lintel in the world known today; there could be larger in other ancient cultures in Mexico or Thailand or elsewhere not yet known to Dodwell in 1819, or in some unusual modern structure. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 05:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply