User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
 

Hello, John P. Sadowski (NIOSH). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Epidemiology of COVID-19 by occupation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

On 8 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Butler Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Butler mansion was built with parquette oak floors, elaborate frescos, wainscot paneling—and a fireproof wing to store the archives of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Butler Building. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Butler Building), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olive Whitlock Klump, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olive Whitlock Klump was the first industrial nurse to work for the U.S. government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olive Whitlock Klump. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olive Whitlock Klump), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United States Marine Hospital (Cincinnati), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first Cincinnati Marine Hospital was taken by the Department of War, and the second by environmental health scientists? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, United States Marine Hospital (Cincinnati)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

On 22 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richards Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a U.S. secretary of commerce wrote of the Richards Building (pictured), "were there such a function as a public incendiary, these buildings are among the first that should receive his official attention"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richards Building. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Richards Building), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I was very cautiously tippy-toeing my way through the easier cite errors in Deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, but had to stop for dinner. Thank you for making the repairs in one fell swoop. It was not my intention to rush you...should I have waited to see if the bot repaired the citations? I have followed the conversation on the talkpage, and deeply appreciate that you were watching over this complex situation.

The splitting of articles is far, far above my WP capability, but observing this situation has been a good learning experience. I will have a better understanding of the problem if I encounter it in the future. Best wishes to you, and thanks for the excellent work you are doing on WP! Sincerely, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Tribe of Tiger: Glad you were able to learn from this. This was an unusual situation, as the initial split had all incorrect references, so it was hard to keep everything straight. Usually splits are a lot smoother. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), I had never "observed" a split soon after it occurred. Good to know that this one was unusual. It would have taken me awhile to realize they had been shifted, albeit in an orderly fashion, during the split. Thanks again, John, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Tribe of Tiger: I didn't realize it at first myself; it had never happened before so I didn't think to check. Actually, another user posted on the talk page that one of the references looked wrong, which led me to take a closer look. I think the big lesson here is to double check even if you're not expecting a problem! John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), well, here's the funny thing. User:Colin posted because I had spotted the error, and asked him to confirm/advise on what I had seen. He very kindly gave credit, to this shy hesitant editor in his well-written "Mistake....on Moderna" TP post. The reason I checked the particular citation, was because I didn't realize that -40 C & -40 F is the intersection of the two measurements scales! ( Not so good with mathematics/science, but I can read a ref.) So, I checked the ref. The 2014 source absolutely could not support the info regarding the Moderna vaccine. I was hesitant to post on such an important medical article's talkpage, without some support from an experienced editor. I won't hesitate in the future...if I am wrong, someone may swat me down, but if I am correct, it may be important for others to know. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 03:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)::

Category:COVID-19_vaccines has
I want to add sub-Categories based on storage temperature
  • Category:COVID-19_vaccines, -70°C
  • Category:COVID-19_vaccines, 5°C
I want to add dosages (e.g. 100 µg, 0.5 ml), doses (1,2), stable storage temperature (2–8°C, -70°C) to the lead section of these articles.

Can you help, or is this a good idea? .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 07:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@0mtwb9gd5wx: I'd suggest posting at WT:COVID to get more feedback. I don't think categories are the right way to show the storage temperature, but that and the dosages can definitely go in the article text. They also might be good for a table in the main COVID-19 vaccine article. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

In the article Remdesivir, you recently made substantial changes, including the addition of a primary source supporting a biomedical claim. WP:MEDRS sets the standard for sourcing of biomedical claims as high quality secondary sources, which the source you added does not reach. Moreover, the article is subject to community-imposed general sanctions described at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019, which specifically requires "Sources for any content related to medical aspects of the disease are expected to adhere to the standards laid down at WP:MEDRS."

I would be grateful, therefore, if you would review your additions to the article and remove all content you added that does not adhere to the standards of MEDRS. --RexxS (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

All thesis on Pyramax, easy explanation using gifs, and contents of global clinical status of Pyramax.

https://blog.naver.com/PostList.nhn?blogId=sizz6789&from=postList&categoryNo=30&parentCategoryNo=30

Englsih translation completed