Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 May 18: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 146:

*'''Endorse deletion''' - don't agree with nom, if a newbie removes a template without an edit summary, you can use a template explaining edit summaries. If editors start to revert war over a template they can be cautioned for going upto 3RR. This warning isn't required. [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 17:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

*'''Endorse''' as deleter, because templates should not misrepresent policy. Because this template is designed similar to other warning templates, it implies that removing maintenance templates is grounds for blocking. Aside from that, novice users will not understand such a warning and advanced users will likely not appreciate being warned by template, so in either case writing a message manually would be better. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 21:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

*'''List at MfD''' This is not the place to set WP policy on the use of templates. Nor is this set by individuals acting via speedy. There is a procedure for this, and it should be followed. Speedy is for unquestionably valid deletions. Radiant has found a definite problem, but the problem can probably be solved by editing the template. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 03:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

====[[:Template:Tpv]]====