Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Tag: Reverted

Line 119:

{{anchor|gen5|H4}} If you have nominated five or more articles in the past, you must complete a full review of one other nomination (unrelated to you) for every subsequent article you nominate‍—‌this is called '''''[[quid pro quo]]''''' or ''QPQ''. A review does not need to be successful to count as a QPQ. Where a nomination offers more than one new or expanded article, an article-for-article quid pro quo (QPQ) is required for each nominated article. As soon as a new nominator's hook includes articles beyond their fifth nomination of an article for DYK, each of those requires a separate QPQ review.

YouYour canQPQ doreview yourmust QPQbe reviewmade beforeat orthe aftertime you makeof your nomination,. but for yourAny nomination towhich bedoesn't approvednot youinclude willa needQPQ to(or provideis afrom link,an atexempt yournominator) nomination,may tobe yourclosed completedas QPQ"incomplete" reviewwithout warning. For help in learning the reviewing process, see the [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide|reviewers' guide]]. Ideally, a QPQ should be submitted within a week of a nomination. After one week, and a reminder to the nominator, a nomination ''may'' be closed as "incomplete." QPQs do not expire and may be used at any time for a future DYK nomination.

{{shortcut|WP:DYKUBM}}