Talk:Joe Carollo - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
@Spelunkingmerica:, there seems to have been some miscommunication here. When I pointed out multiple policy links that your preferred text were possibly or plainly in violation of here, on your talk page, and on the BLP noticeboard, it was with the intention that you would read and attempt to apply those policies to the problematic text. I did not mean to suggest that you should re-post the problematic text verbatim to the talk page and hope it would be accepted. I apologize if I gave you that impression. There is no intention to defend the subject of this article or to gate-keep negative coverage away. Text such as you have suggested can get this site sued out of existence even if everything you have posted is true and has been published elsewhere. Please read the links you have been given previously, especially the Core Content Policies (and their sub-pages) and the Manual of Style. If you have specific questions, please do not hesitate to ask here or at my talk page. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)
If the most we can find sourced about him relates to a domestic violence charge, then I have reservations about whether he is notable enough for an article. It could easily be tagged for proposed deletion right now: in its shortened form, it cites no reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Still working on this article, but I'm going to assume the notability concerns are obviously irrelevant now. LaborRising (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Removed as undue weight. Feel free to revert, but I think it needs to go.. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply