User talk:Angeldeb82 - Wikipedia

Zerbu ^Talk 03:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Zerbu ^Talk 03:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I hope you are doing well! I am looking to improve Bass Rush: ECOGEAR PowerWorm Championship, Cyber Groove, and Rich Diamond, do you have any additional sources for any of those? BOZ (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Worth checking the company pages for these games. (Visco Corporation for Bass Rush for example). Maybe there are links to reviews there. Timur9008 (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The only source I know of Rich Diamond is the archived link (June 30, 1999) from The Electric Playground. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Newsday review had the company website listed for RIch Diamond. [1], [2] I'm still checking Timur9008 (talk) 19:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Very nice, thanks! I already had the Newsday review in there, but I added the Electric Playground review. BOZ (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

IGN articles on Cyber Groove [3] Timur9008 (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I added a review to that game from IGN. :) BOZ (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I discovered a Famitsu link got Bass Rush, and it turns out that the Japanese release date is actually April 27, 2000. That means that someone at GameFAQs got the release date a day off. Also, from what I can read in Japanese, Famitsu gave the game a score of 27 out of 40, as shown in this link here. Angeldeb82 (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh, thanks. I'm glad you can read that. :) I'm not sure how many of the pages listed here are reviews, or which ones are in English. BOZ (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering about a couple of merged and redirected articles, to see if you had enough reviews for me to bring them back? Rock & Roll Racing 2: Red Asphalt was redirected from here, and Microsoft Revenge of Arcade was redirected from here. I can restore them if there are enough sources to make it worthwhile. BOZ (talk) 22:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

How about, do you see anything more for Alien Earth, D-Xhird, or Fallen Haven? BOZ (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well, all I know is that I found info about D-Xhird, and it says that in Japan, Famitsu gave it a score of 23 out of 40, as shown in this link here. Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nice, thanks, I added that. :) BOZ (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

How about, do you see anything more for Robotron X, Blam! Machinehead, or Project Horned Owl? BOZ (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Los Angeles Times article mention for Robotron X [4] (not sure if useful) Timur9008 (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's useful. :) BOZ (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

How about these, do you see anything more for Gunblade NY, Thexder 95, or Skyborg: Into the Vortex? BOZ (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

How about, do you have anything for VR Troopers (video game), Space Griffon VF-9, or Curse of Dragor? BOZ (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why do you keep nagging me or asking me for sources about 1995-96 obscure video games that you only did a NextGen review on every few days or so? It's so annoying. Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, I won't ask for any more. Sorry for that. BOZ (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Angeldeb82, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Google Chrome version history, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Chrome version history (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Firefox version history, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefox version history (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you look at {{vgreviews}}, it says not to include scores unless they're in the prose. You also shouldn't change citations formats when someone has clearly established a certain style. Also, please don't remove {{vgrelease}}; this is recommended in {{infobox video game}}. I'm also not sure why you're removing double-spaces after periods. Please don't do that. This is allowed by MOS:DOUBLESPACE, so it shouldn't be removed just because you don't like it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gex 3: Deep Cover Gecko, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please see MOS:VG, which says {{Video game reviews}} "supplements the reception section; it does not replace it" and "it is not to replicate the function of external review aggregators." Each entries in the template should be summarized in prose in the reception section. We already link to Metacritic and report the Metascore, so a bunch of ratings without context doesn't really help much. Also, in this edit, you said Tomorrow Never Dies "received mixed reviews according to the review aggregation website GameRankings", but the source cited does not say anything about "mixed reviews". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You're still ignoring what the MOS says. For example, in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rowan's Battle of Britain, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Have a happy holidays! Angeldeb82 (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 23:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. I just added a bunch of sources to the talk page of Outland (video game). I also noticed that you had contributed a good portion of the article previously. If you were still interested in the article, there should be enough to make a good development section, and after a good copy edit, the article would likely pass a Good Article Nomination. Again, just throwing this out there if you were so inclined to work on it further. If not, please disregard. Have a good one. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 16:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC))Reply

Hello,

I noticed you took out a lot of the citations in Pursuit Force wiki. Majority of the links are still working so I don't understand what you mean by "obsolete." If you do remove them, please replace them with newer references and not just put "[citation needed]" and expect others to do it for you. Krisfrosz133 (talk) 04:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply