User talk:JSwift49 - Wikipedia
3 people in discussion
Hi JSwift49, we currently have an ongoing November AfC backlog drive and are about to reach zero pending submissions so if you come across drafts you think might meet the notability guidelines, now is the time to submit them. S0091 (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Ok đź‘Ť thanks JSwift49 18:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- I appreciate the intent but please do not submit my draft for me. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- No worries! JSwift49 22:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks. I hope I didn't come across too harshly, I just wanted to say that the draft isn't abandoned. I plan on moving a bunch of content around and I just prefer it to be in draftspace for now if that's alright. I do appreciate that you wrote a better lede :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Of course :) take my submission of your draft as a compliment. JSwift49 22:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks. I hope I didn't come across too harshly, I just wanted to say that the draft isn't abandoned. I plan on moving a bunch of content around and I just prefer it to be in draftspace for now if that's alright. I do appreciate that you wrote a better lede :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- No worries! JSwift49 22:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- I appreciate the intent but please do not submit my draft for me. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Could be an article later when he gets more coverage that can be used as sources. Right now I will decline this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Crew and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
– Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indian Miniature Paintings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Carotane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not quite enough independent, significant coverage to show why this is notable enough for a Wikipedia article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Memory Bandera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Salt Lake City bid for the 2030 Winter Olympics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
| Â | Hello, JSwift49! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! voorts (talk/contributions) 23:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply |
Norton Challenge P86, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Phillips v. City of New York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hilton Paris Opéra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Updown Girl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Decline in wild mammal populations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many unsourced claims, too.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kunsthaus Göttingen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Operation Leopard (1980), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Historic bars and saloons in San Francisco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Has several issues with tone, and over-citations in areas which should probably just be removed due to WP:NPOV. Referring to lines such as: "This exposure gave him a sense of what was possible", "later immersed himself in jazz", and the deep dives into every single play in lines such as "Each of the four main characters comes with his or her own personal “race” to run" with unencyclopedic focus.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victor Gordon (playwright) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most coverage specific to this person feels routine; other references do not appear to hit the SIGCOV threshold for establishing GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Daigle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Chitosan nanoparticles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Peatland restoration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Russia-Ukraine War and its geopolitical consequences in the Arctic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Kunsthaus Göttingen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, JSwift49
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Rubén Marrero Pernas, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § Rubén Marrero Pernas.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
On 4 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Updown Girl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that archaeologists found that Updown Girl, who was buried in England in the 7th century, had a mixture of West African and European DNA? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Updown Girl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Updown Girl), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, JSwift49
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Hoot Gipson, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 14 § Hoot Gipson.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gonzalo Lira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
A tag has been placed on Christina Cewe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Christian. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Cewe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Cewe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to Gonzalo Lira. I appreciate your attention to reliable sourcing, neutrality, and copyediting. Keep up the good work! Jfire (talk) 02:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you and I appreciate all of your help as well on this. JSwift49 03:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello, allow me to congratulate you for your selfless work in maintaining the Gonzalo Lira article in English. You could also give an opinion on the article on Wikipedia Simple, which is also undergoing a deletion or maintenance query. I hope to see you there. https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalo_Lira# 57ntaledane9 (talk) 07:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello, thank you for your opinion in the article, what do you think about keeping this article relevant, I see it with enough sources that make it notable and true, leave your opinion in the article consultation and thank you again https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Sharma#/editor/2 57ntaledane9 (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- It’s pretty self explanatory just include the sources in the English version JSwift49 20:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- As for this one I haven’t worked on it so won’t weigh in but thanks. JSwift49 20:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- It’s pretty self explanatory just include the sources in the English version JSwift49 20:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello, thank you for your opinion in the article, what do you think about keeping this article relevant, I see it with enough sources that make it notable and true, leave your opinion in the article consultation and thank you again https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Sharma#/editor/2 57ntaledane9 (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, JSwift49. Thank you for your work on Military exercise at the 1900 Summer Olympics. BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Surprised there was an Olympic event missing an article! Thanks for your contribution!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @BeanieFan11: Sure thing, there were a couple :) JSwift49 00:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, good day could you help me give a more neutral composition and writing to Dhruv Sharma article and achieve compliance with Wikipedia standards? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Sharma_(singer) 57ntaledane9 (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Help 57ntaledane9 (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I'm not interested in this subject sorry but read the rules and it'll come naturally! It seems the problem is simply that you paraphrased a copyrighted source JSwift49 17:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 Hello, I have to inform you that the consensus for the Vyond article is that the so-called "grounded" videos are not notable. In addition, Know Your Meme is not a reliable source. You are requested not to attempt adding back any mention of such videos without a better reliable source, otherwise it may amount to disruptive editing. I am sorry if this sounds serious, but nearly all previous edits involving such videos have been disruptive. --Minoa (talk) 03:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hi, it's ok, thanks for letting me know. JSwift49 15:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I added it back with a couple of better sources. JSwift49 20:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Toilets in New York City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Michelle Coltrane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hocker (sport), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- Thank you! JSwift49 19:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ross Perot 1996 presidential campaign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Your sources don't mention both "grounded" videos and Vyond; as such, your addition violates WP:SYNTH. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- GoAnimate is the precursor to Vyond. The first source alone confirms it is an internet meme/subculture and should be enough:
- "This isn’t some tiny niche thing – a YouTube search for “caillou grounded” gets almost a quarter of a million results. Grounded videos can be over half an hour long, or as short as a minute. And they’re also weird as hell. The majority of grounded videos are made with a free program called GoAnimate, which was first released in 2008."
- "There are plenty of GoAnimate subcultures on YouTube, but none quite as huge and terrifying as grounded videos. Every day sees at least 50 unique new clips updated to the service from a variety of users."
- Second and third sources corroborate this category of videos existing, and the citation was only to confirm their existence.
- "Nour repeatedly complained about Karim watching fan-produced Caillou and Baldi videos on YouTube that were animated by using the software program GoAnimate. The videos contained gore and violence, and Nour worried about Karim repeating or reenacting what he heard and saw. I sat with Karim as he watched one such video about Caillou bringing a murdered girl back from the dead and another in which a teacher hits Baldi with a ruler. Karim commented that the Baldi video was “funny . . . cause his teacher hits him,” but also asked Nour and me questions that indicated his confusion about the inner state of the character (“Does the teacher like him? Why does he get mad? He made a mistake?”). Nour was concerned that if Karim mimicked the language or behavior in the videos, it “could get him in trouble” with his teachers"
- "There are also tons of tweets referring to the YouTube parody series Caillou Gets Grounded with each video typically ending with Caillou, well, getting grounded." JSwift49 13:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- "Geek.com" does not meet WP:RS criteria by any stretch. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Would you explain why? JSwift49 19:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Geek.com was a blogging platform, and blogs are not enough to establish notability. --Minoa (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Got it, I hadn’t thought it was a blog. JSwift49 10:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Geek.com was a blogging platform, and blogs are not enough to establish notability. --Minoa (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Would you explain why? JSwift49 19:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- "Geek.com" does not meet WP:RS criteria by any stretch. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 The redirect Grounded videos has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12 § Grounded videos until a consensus is reached. Aitraintheeditorandgamer (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Eurypontid dynasty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 09:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
23 March 1933 Reichstag speech, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
WOH S264, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
EVA1C, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- @JSwift49, Since you submitted the draft, can you please provide citations for the statements that I've marked with a cite tag? Regards. X (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hi; I submitted it as an abandoned draft so I’m not sure where I’d find those citations, I can try and look JSwift49 10:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- List of Wife Swap (American TV series) episodes
- added links pointing to Biker, Conservationist, Goth, Ghost hunters, Low riding and George Bush
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
do you have the videos called strawberry shortcake sets the school on fire and charlie brown gets a gold card? they've become lost media and i'm trying to hunt them down at this point - if not its fine 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:8D2D:27D6:FCDF:462A (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No JSwift49 22:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Also Charlie Brown does not deserve the gold card in any possible universe JSwift49 22:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- oh ok thanks for telling me 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:6CF2:9A31:EFE9:8756 (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks for the additions and sources. The source saying that the IIHF 'unveiled' seems suspect since the group names are wrong. I suspect they are still discussing hosting which could precipitate changes to who wants to participate or not, and whether lower ranked asian nations want to travel or not. The source appears to have just copied and pasted from the Slovenian Ice Hockey Federation site, which would be more reliable, but it is doubtful that the nationalteams site assertion that the IIHF has just not updated their site is accurate.18abruce (talk) 11:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Ig you could replace the source with the Slovenian one. I'm ok with this bc if changes happen they happen. JSwift49 12:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Te Hiringa Mahara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Flag of Republic of Formosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, JSwift49,
Thank you for creating James Appathurai.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We need to see some articles from independent quality sources (e.g. not NATO sourced) on him as the main subject, and especially WP:SIGCOV pieces. As a senior NATO employee he will get passing mentions in places as a consequence of his work, but to be WP:GNG we need to see pieces on him. thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Aszx5000 (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks; I added several more, not 100% if if it's enough but it's as good as it'll get. JSwift49 12:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Aszx5000: Forgot to sign JSwift49 12:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 Hello, JSwift49. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Virginia Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monkey hate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pests.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ichinoyama Kofun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
1) bring your bad faith allegations to my Talk page so everyone can fairly see them for posterity
2) strike your baseless aspersions upon me
3) ANI soibangla (talk) 02:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Adames, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Adames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
you thought I removed it but I actually moved it up
now, what's that you were saying about me pushing an agenda?
just. too. funny.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_2025&diff=prev&oldid=1233687146 soibangla (talk) 13:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have twice reverted the term "incorrectly" from the Kamala Harris article today [1] [2]. That page has a 1RR restriction, which you violated with your second revert of that term within 24 hours. Please self-revert your latest reversion, or else you may be reported to WP:AE for the violation. – notwally (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Notwally I don't think this editor has been notified about American Politics WP:CTOP. JSwift49, best to self-revert. See the "Warning: active arbitration remedies" at the top of the article's talk page. S0091 (talk) 20:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Oh I had no idea thank you JSwift49 20:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Notwally On closer look, the first time I simply moved the “incorrectly” to a quote from so it was attributed. The second time was a reversion of your edit (which I stand by). I would not call my first instance a revert, so I don’t believe I violated this rule. JSwift49 20:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No, that quote already had the word "incorrectly" in it in its citation text (including both times the Axios was cited and quoted). Your edit did not move the word "incorrectly" at all, but rather simply removed it from the article text. Once again, please self-revert. – notwally (talk) 20:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- The number of times “incorrect/incorrectly” appeared in the text of the article, both before and after my edit, was once. Before it was a general statement and after I attributed that phrasing to a source. It’s not the same as reversion I’m afraid. JSwift49 21:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No, that quote already had the word "incorrectly" in it in its citation text (including both times the Axios was cited and quoted). Your edit did not move the word "incorrectly" at all, but rather simply removed it from the article text. Once again, please self-revert. – notwally (talk) 20:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of East Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eulenspiegel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Picropodophyllin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hi JSwift49, I would like to ask a question regarding the article Olympic Sports and actually make an edit request: shall we add a section on Youth Olympics sports? The IOC’s official website enlists Olympic Sports (incl. Youth disciplines), and some disciplines have been featured only during the Youth Olympics (eg. Beach Handball, Acrobatic Gymnastics, Rolling Speed Skating, Beach Wrestling, and Futsal; in addition, demonstration Sports included Karting). The main Sports page shows Summer, Winter, and Youth disciplines together, so it shouldn’t be controversial. Perhaps we could just mention those exclusively held at the Youth Olympics; it might be interesting for an average reader. Also, the website mentions Coastal Rowing now; shall we mention it as well? May I ask you to add all this information to the article, please? Thank you in advance. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 20:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hi. I think since the Youth Olympic Games are fundamentally different from the Olympic Games proper, they should not be on the same page. There is a table of the YOG sports at Youth_Olympic_Games#Sports. Re. coastal rowing that will take place in 2028 and I believe someone will update the table once the 2024 Games are over.
- If you want to start a discussion feel free to post on Talk:Olympic sports JSwift49 22:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it. The reason why I’ve thought it would be reasonable to include these disciplines on the same page was because the IOC does so (see their official website at the Sports section). That means all the mentioned disciplines are not only recognized by the IOC but also held at Youth Olympics; the article mentions all the sports governed by the officially recognized federations, so I thought it’d be useful for readers to mention YOG disciplines as well. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 00:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Youth Olympics are just so much less important than the Olympics. They are a different class of event. So I think it’s appropriate to not lump them together. The “Olympic Games” article on Wikipedia isn’t about the YOG, and you can think of “Olympic sports” as a section of the “Olympic Games” article that was split off. JSwift49 01:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I think your arguments are true; I mean, I wouldn’t want to suggest the YOG are equally important or something like that (I’m even surprised the IOC classifies them together). But if the article mentions all potential sports (eg. sumo), perhaps there would be a way to mention the disciplines such as Futsal (if these are also on the official website)? I mean, they can be regarded as potential disciplines, too. Maybe at the end of the article just something like "other disciplines recognized by the IOC and currently held only at Youth Olympics include" with the reference to the IOC’s Sports subpage? I wouldn’t mention them not as Olympic Sports proper but rather in the context of recognized/potential disciplines. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 01:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I would keep Youth Olympics out of it, it has its own page and there's no need to confuse things. If you want to list all the non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic federations, like Futsal, Roller skating, Telemark skiing and whatever, I'm not sure about that either because it runs contrary to the purpose of the article "Olympic sports". JSwift49 01:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I see your point but still I think it’s a bit odd to have all the recognized sports (currently non-Olympic) and no mention of currently non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic Sports. The article even idicates which non-Olympic sports are contested at the World Games (a very different event as well). It feels a bit incomplete especially since the IOC itself enlists YOG disciplines together with the Olympics ones. I think there should be a list of non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic Sports and even a footnote indicating which of them are contested at the YOG (similar to the footnote about the World Games). That’s my personal opinion, though. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Again I think it’s out of scope of the article so I don’t support it. If you want it added please post in the Talk page and try to get support for your idea. JSwift49 20:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I see your point but still I think it’s a bit odd to have all the recognized sports (currently non-Olympic) and no mention of currently non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic Sports. The article even idicates which non-Olympic sports are contested at the World Games (a very different event as well). It feels a bit incomplete especially since the IOC itself enlists YOG disciplines together with the Olympics ones. I think there should be a list of non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic Sports and even a footnote indicating which of them are contested at the YOG (similar to the footnote about the World Games). That’s my personal opinion, though. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I would keep Youth Olympics out of it, it has its own page and there's no need to confuse things. If you want to list all the non-Olympic disciplines of Olympic federations, like Futsal, Roller skating, Telemark skiing and whatever, I'm not sure about that either because it runs contrary to the purpose of the article "Olympic sports". JSwift49 01:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I think your arguments are true; I mean, I wouldn’t want to suggest the YOG are equally important or something like that (I’m even surprised the IOC classifies them together). But if the article mentions all potential sports (eg. sumo), perhaps there would be a way to mention the disciplines such as Futsal (if these are also on the official website)? I mean, they can be regarded as potential disciplines, too. Maybe at the end of the article just something like "other disciplines recognized by the IOC and currently held only at Youth Olympics include" with the reference to the IOC’s Sports subpage? I wouldn’t mention them not as Olympic Sports proper but rather in the context of recognized/potential disciplines. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 01:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Youth Olympics are just so much less important than the Olympics. They are a different class of event. So I think it’s appropriate to not lump them together. The “Olympic Games” article on Wikipedia isn’t about the YOG, and you can think of “Olympic sports” as a section of the “Olympic Games” article that was split off. JSwift49 01:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it. The reason why I’ve thought it would be reasonable to include these disciplines on the same page was because the IOC does so (see their official website at the Sports section). That means all the mentioned disciplines are not only recognized by the IOC but also held at Youth Olympics; the article mentions all the sports governed by the officially recognized federations, so I thought it’d be useful for readers to mention YOG disciplines as well. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 00:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Could be notable under WP:ANYBIO, but there are no citations in the article backing the claim that she has won anything. GNG is not established because all the sources, except for one, are either trivial namedrops or primary.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Strong (journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, JSwift49,
Please sign all comments or complaints you bring to a noticeboard. Right now, it looks like your complaint was posted by the editor you are complaining about. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for letting me know; I had wrongly assumed it would sign automatically :) JSwift49 10:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
In this edit, you switched a comma to a colon. The comma was better. If it had just said "three more children: a, b, and c.", the colon would have been fine, but for "...a, b, and c were born in wherever" it's not, as "were born in" logically continues "three more children". You could set the name of the offspring off with dashes or parenthesis, and that would be fine. (I'm not going to undo your edit because I have a conflict of interest regarding that page, but I suggest you review it and consider undoing it yourself.) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 17:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Switched colon to comma. Thanks for letting me know! JSwift49 17:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alexandre Raymond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, JSwift49. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Poloncarz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Olympic Games scandals, controversies and incidents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snow machine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for uploading File:People and Justice Union (centrists, nationalists) logo (2024).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kara Eberle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
OpenHistoricalMap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 00:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antarctica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply