User talk:Kathleen's bike - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

Hello, Kathleen's bike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Devokewater 18:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kathleen, I put the references in the comment when I did the edit, did I do it wrong ? Ticklehill (talk) 19:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kathleen's bike,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Post-Troubles violence for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Post-Troubles violence to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 17:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the noticeboard regarding reason. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kemp".The discussion is about the topic //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kemp.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Tomatoesarefruit (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

im so sorry please forgive me I didn't know that it was already linked I didn't check soeery

Ayunipear (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Regarding the history of the Michele Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) redirect/article. Looking at the page log it appears this was a redirect until some time around 10 January 2024 (probably 9 January), presumably by the IP 69.117.93.145. Could anyone confirm the exact date/time the redirect was changed into an article please, as it relates to edits made on 9 January by the IP and a related account. Thanks. Kathleen's bike (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

14:44, 9 January 2024.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  It would be a good idea for you to post messages at Talk:Papua conflict and Talk:Indonesian National Revolution#Supported by: explaining why you think that these articles should not have "supported by" in their infoboxes. This would be useful to other editors who might not realise that this feature of infoboxes is inappropriate for such articles. (I assume that you do not want other editors reverting to the version before your edits.)-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will do that later. The most problematic editor will not be able to revert for now, unless they decide to continue this disruptive editing as an IP. I feel an enforcement request while they are blocked is a bit pointless, but if they continue after the block I will make an enforcement request asking for them to be banned from edits relating to infoboxes, which would allow them to edit productively elsewhere. Kathleen's bike (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I did not know that "supported by" fields in infoboxes were deprecated before your edits. As implemented in these Indonesia-related conflict articles they were confusing, and their values were subject to edit turbulence.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for asking the page to be protected at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase, I request that the page Indonesian National Revolution be protected to indefinite. The alleged vandalism IP by the previously blocked user and normal Good-faith IP addresses could be easily differentiated. Please, if the page would be protected then the previous edits made by the vandal IP and the Rembo01 related accounts should also be reverted aswell. 149.108.61.213 (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply