User talk:Squeeps10 - Wikipedia


2 people in discussion

Article Images
Please be sure to ping me if you respond to me anywhere other than my talk page, as I don't tend to watchlist discussion or talk pages. I will ping you when I reply out of the same courtesy. I have no aversion to templated messages, as long as there is a good reason for them. Finally, I reserve the right to make formatting or grammatical changes to anything you write on my talk page, and I give you permission to do the same. I won't make edits to grammar or formatting on your talk page, however.

This page was last edited or modified by CFA (talk).

Hey there, just a small heads-up, I moved the discussion you initiated to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Creation of a CSD criteria for articles and drafts with no encyclopedic value which is the proper venue for such discussions. Regards SoWhy 17:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks for the heads up SoWhy. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your recent edits on Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese! I notice you’ve put it on your list of drafts you’re working on- anything that can help get the article in shape for a successful review is very much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mojo0606, I'm not much of a writer, but I'll do what I can! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Wrong ping, I meant Mojo0306. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yup, let me know if there's anything else I can do for you User:Mojo0306! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 22:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
As you have probably seen, the article was rejected on the basis of apparent lack of notability. If there are any reliable sources out there that I haven’t included in the article that help to build further notability, then they would be most welcome! Mojo0306 (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'll have a look when I get a chance. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 23:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for resubmitting for review! Hopefully it’ll be accepted this time! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hopefully! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've seen your answer at WP:RDS regarding UV radiation! Thanks! On the mentioned site of FDA I've also noticed a sentence re the "limited published data" regarding the subject. How can this aspect be dealed with to get more info from ongoing research projects and testing labs?--86.124.193.84 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not the most qualified person to ask, I'd check with the refdesk again. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 02:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Re the ping, I do not quite understand how it works.--86.124.193.84 (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
You just type {{u|Example}}, replacing "Example" with the username of the person you want to ping. Since you're editing under an IP address, not an account, you can't be pinged, but I believe you can ping other people. If you want to receive pings, you'll have to create an account. Let me know if you have any more questions. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

MurielMary (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Redesigning the featured, good, and article assessment icons. Pbrks (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 24#Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Modern Rogue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Squeeps10,

I don't know if you'll be doing much tagging of stale drafts, but if you live in the U.S., please be aware that the U.S. is on Daylight Savings Time now but six months ago, it was on Standard Time. So, there is a one hour time difference between the time schedule for today (July 7th) and that of six months ago (January 7th). That means that a draft whose last human edit was 4 pm, January 7, 2021 can be tagged for speedy deletion at 5 pm, July 7, 2021. And this arrangement will be switched around in the fall when the U.S. goes back to Standard Time. There is really only a short period of time in the year when the time schedule for the current day is the same as it was six months ago.

The reason why observing this difference is important is that there are probably a dozen editors and admins who actively work with expiring drafts and it's important that everyone is on the same page. Wikipedia is on UTC time so it can help if you have the current UTC time displayed on your Wikipedia menu. I'm not sure of the script or setting but I'm sure someone would know at the Teahouse. Also, if you make use of SDZeroBot's G13 lists, they are displayed on UTC which doesn't change over the course of the year so that is a way you can check if you're tagging drafts too early or an hour late. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Liz: Ah, I thought it was weird that the bot hadn't added those to the category yet. I forgot about the time difference. Though quite frankly I doubt an hour will make a difference for a draft that no one has touched in some 4,392 hours. I've set Wikipedia to display local time for convenience reasons and have no plans to change it back. That being said, the setting is buried somewhere in the Preferences menu.
We have had discussions like this before, I believe they can be found further up on my talk page or one of the archives. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 00:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Hitro talk 08:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Squeeps10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 08:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you recently reverted two changes made by user Shust17. As the user is new to Wikipedia, would you mind leaving a brief explanation of the revert on their talk page? Roper Klacks (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lirim Hajrullahu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Zuerlein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Albuquerque mayoral election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Modern Rogue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2025 Albuquerque mayoral election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Elway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Paton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Lawrence Clarke, 7th Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see evidence of notability at the moment. If she wins the election then she may be notable under WP:NPOL, but until then she has to meet the general notability guideline. Please expand the Yahoo News links into proper references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

C F A 💬 05:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply