User talk:Suntag - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
This user may have left Wikipedia. Suntag has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

thumbCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

I noticed your comment about WP:NICK's newsletter. Thanks!

On a much more serious note, I'm so sorry about your recent RfA. I would have supported you if I knew you were going through, and maybe, just maybe, it would have helped. I wish I could have been there. If you need anything, feel free to drop me a line. :-) -phobia don't be afraid to drop a line! 17:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC) N 35.83146° E 51.01517°Reply

Happy New Year Suntag!

I finished the article on "Love Systems" (User:Coaster7/Love_Systems) and I want to put it back in DRV to get the page back up. Is it correct that an admin, like you, should put it there? I am not sure after reading some of the deletion policies. Thanks in advance. Coaster7 (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year to you, too. I'm not an admin and anyone can post a request at DRV. Basically, your request will be to allow recreation of the article. -- Suntag ☼ 16:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clearing that up. I submitted it. Thanks again for your help. It really helped out and shape the article in the best way possible.Coaster7 (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pursuant to your response at WP:BLP/N, as the disruption is coming from a single IP, would it not be more focussed to target that address? The offending IP address seems to be static, so a permanent block may do the trick. If you agree, could you oblige? Ohconfucius (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

your recent edit to Miss Tourism World does not provide any verifaible sources and has been reverted, Kindy provide sources for your information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.71.90 (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have also worked on the "Nick Savoy" page that was previously deleted. After using your approach on the Love Systems page, I tried to answer 1) who is Nick Savoy? and 2) What does Nick Savoy do?. Could you help me on improving the article on Nick Savoy? Thanks in advance Suntag. Coaster7 (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The approach doesn't involve seeking to answer any question. Whatever the reliable sources say about the topic is what goes in the article in chronological order. As for the Nick Savoy article, it reads he was born under his stage name and then he received his B.A. He was born under his real name and I'm sure something happened to him before he received his B.A. You should work the last eight or so sentences into the article chronologically. As for the general approach, first gather all your raw research material into one Microsoft word document in chronological order. I added some links at User talk:Coaster7/Nick Savoy that should help you find the research material from Google. To find reliable source material not indexed by Google news, books, scholar, go through the pages here looking for news articles, etc. Arrange everything in the MS word document chronologically, create your citation strings for each entry, and save as Nick Savoy research. Then copy that document to Nick Savoy article. Open the MS word Nick Savoy article and add the coding for Template:Biography to the top. Use that as the framework within which to develop the article. Next, go through each reliable source, starting at the top. Apply whatever you find to the draft article. Once done with a source, erase it and move onto the next one. Repeat until all the sources have been erased. Next display a preview of your draft article in Wikipedia. This will show how the article will appear without actually saving the article. Read what is shown and change and save the Nick Savoy article Microsoft word document accordingly. That will help you avoid losing changes &action=edit pages if your computer get disconnected from the Internet. Then copy the Nick Savoy article Microsoft word document to your open Wikipedia edit page and hit the preview button. Keep repeating until your draft is ready to be posted to Wikipedia. -- Suntag ☼ 14:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Great advice Suntag. I will use this approach and will let you know how it goes. Thanks again.Coaster7 (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've revised the page again with your approach. The new sources I've found were good and the approach you suggested worked out great. Thanks for that. Do you mind having a final look before I submit it to DRV? Thanks again Suntag. Coaster7 (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery
From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

My area of greatest interest, and specialty, is music, so I generally restrict myself to those articles. I've also been trying to spend less time on this website in general; I'd prefer to contribute somewhere where my work is afforded some measure of permanence. But it looks like the DRV is headed in the direction of restoring for that website, and I think that's appropriate, so I think it should turn out quite well even without my help. Cheers! Chubbles (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The GA review for Tessa Ludwick is done, and the article is currently on hold. Please respond on the article's GA review page. Thanks. Nikki♥311 20:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suntag, I've been meaning to e-mail you about my feelings on your RfA but I've been on vacation for a while and haven't had much internet access. Anyway, after seeing your latest post at WT:DYK, I just wanted to say I agree with you that you didn't do anything wrong by nominating a lot of hooks; everyone who understands DYK knows that you did it to help DYK, not to help yourself, and that lots of other contributors do the same thing. To be perfectly honest, I was pretty angry to see your RfA, which up until then had been looking like almost a done deal, get hijacked and ruined over false issues put forth by individuals who don't appear to understand what they were talking about (with no offense meant to Mattisse, who is an editor who has helped me a lot on WP, but whose actions in this case I just don't agree with). I tried to post a statement at the RfA defending your nominations, but it must have been too little, too late, because the RfA ended just a few days after that. It infuriates me because (although, admittedly, I wasn't paying close attention to the discussion over the last couple days), the issue that seemed to define the RfA was this stupid non-issue; maybe it's partly my fault, and the fault of other people at DYK, for not having come sooner to quiet these people's regrettable misunderstandings of how DYK works.

A lot of people seemed to think that your being a good contributor means that you're trying to game the system to become an admin as fast as possible. If good contributions in a variety of areas is the same as gaming the system, what makes the rest of those people any better than you and me and the other editors who have consistently come under attack? Politizer talk/contribs 14:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering if I could ask you to look over Daytona Beach Golf Course and see if you could find a "DYK" for it. I seem to have a AfD stalker who wants to delete the article. Thanks. Gamweb (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 31 October 2008 AfD seemed to be a straight forward keep. DYK would first require a 5x expansion of the article. -- Suntag ☼ 17:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was just asked on my talk page for some help with articles from individual years of this which were merged after Afds, but have since been restored with little visible improvments. As I think you're already working with the ed. who did it, perhaps you can follow up. If you need any admin help, just let me know--see my talk page at [1]. DGG (talk) 04:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have decided to do some additional editing; I agree with leaving out what you left out, but I'm not sure that everything still in there ought to remain. see the talk p. DGG (talk) 21:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm just dropping you a note, as requested, to let you know that TouchWave has been reviewed for GA status, and placed on hold for a few issues. The full review can be found at Talk:TouchWave/GA1. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, you forgot to sign this :) Cheers, Gwen Gale (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

--Dravecky (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Suntag. Because of some suggestions from Gatoclass back in December, I've started working on a new DYK nomination template, possibly to replace {{DYKsuggestion}} and {{DYKsug}}. I've left an [as brief as possible] explanation and request for feedback at WT:DYK#Working on a better nomination template. I know you're not very active at DYK now (and I can't blame you...after the various events of December, I have barely worked there either, and the main reason I'm still working on this is because I told Gato in December that I would do it so it's kind of just unfinished business that I need to get off my conscious), but since you were the biggest contributor to the current DYKsuggestion/DYKsug system, it would be helpful if you could come and take a quick look, if you have a moment.

Oh, and this is pretty unrelated, but as for our last project (trying to make a list of DYKs that have gone on to FA/FL/GA), I've finally gotten up and running, and you can see the finished [more or less] product here.

Thanks, and I hope all is well, Politizer talk/contribs 02:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I read your deletion review comment regarding Livecare Support Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_January_14. I hope you don't mind if I ask you something. Obviously I don't agree with all the comments, and obviously I don't want to keep asking to change your mind.

I ask to you if it's possible, and if it's correct to add the name of Livecare Support into the article Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software. I will add only the name, without links.

Please tell me if my question is not correct or if I've to ask to somebody else. Wikipedia policy is a bit complicated for me. I wait your reply. Alfax (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I seem to recall it was you who wrote this program. I moved it from the Suggestions page to a new page, Template:Did you know/Queue, and now it doesn't seem to be updating anymore. Did I do something wrong, and more importantly, can you fix it? Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it does seem to have updated now, so maybe it's working okay after all :) Gatoclass (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, James Matador, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Matador. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Handrem (talk • contribs) 03:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

as i predicted, they will stop at no lame excuse to delete the article. Dogue (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

but the Area 58 article lives on [2] thanks for your help, anyhow. Dogue (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered at 05:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

It's on hold, YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

When you come back, just message me and we can resume. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suntag, at one time you expressed an interest and intention to work to improve my BLP. It is now nominated for deletion, and I am hoping you might still see some potential for improvement to it. I would really appreciate it if you would review the matter and post your thoughtful opinion here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ray_Joseph_Cormier#Ray_Joseph_Cormier

DoDaCanaDa (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I notice you added Category:Bird families to this article - please be careful with categories; it this case it's only a species not a family. Thanks. Richard001 (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

After 8 months standing guard alone against all attacks on the Subject, and after surviving two AfD discussions, I thank God an Editor with the interest and vision, has come forward to improve the article.

He has just reworked the first Section, but it´s not in the article yet. As an Editor who once expressed an interest in improving it, what do you think of his editing?

User:Sarcasticidealist/Cormier Peace DoDaCanaDa (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 13:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:OldCharlesRiverLock2001.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:OldCharlesRiverLock2001.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:OldCharlesRiverLock2001.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnnyVenocurSavageStreets.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Category:Votes for deletion templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:California business citation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Today has been nominated for merging with Template:Date. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 271° 25' 15" NET 18:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi !

Since you're the creator/editor of a Google books template I'd like to make you aware of the following discussion:

Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#Should_Google_book_links_for_inline_citations_be_banned_from_featured_articles

--Kmhkmh (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Cite style and sources has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 02:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I just noticed the Category:Wikipedia Did you know articles that are featured articles that you created. Is it possible to create a category for articles that are in this category that were at one time WP:GAs. It would give us a pool of articles to search for WP:FOUR award articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Golden Kite Award winners (book), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Category:Stub types for deletion templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

A template you created, Template:SSDI rootsweb, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 7 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{db-deprecated}} tag from the template. If you have no objections regarding the deletion, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. CompliantDrone (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SwingingTheAlphabetScreenShot.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:SOTD protected has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheRecyclerCover2008.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheRecyclerLogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Jeff in thailand 2.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 Template:SSDI rootsweb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 02:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmongstFriends1993.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Non-free animated images has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Archive box collapsible example.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot. No other obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply