- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 00:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Iron Golem (Minecraft) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a Video Game Guide, and this page does not belong here without meeting WP:GNG. SWinxy (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SWinxy (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As failing GNG, gamecruft material. User:IanTEB even admitted it would be deleted before creating it. Hopefully they will be more discerning before making future articles, per WP:PAGEDECIDE, as making many articles like this while admitting they are non-notable can be called disruptive.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A relatively minor video game creature. Most of the content of this article is just a game guide, as are nearly all of the sources. Rorshacma (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable video game mob/entity failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS, rather being passing mentions, in context of the game itself and as game guide-like material. Regardless of notability bar, this is WP:GAMECRUFT/WP:GAMEGUIDE and does not require a separate article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's an attempt, but this one is never going to make it over the bar. There are not enough sources to meet WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Delete It's clear this fails the notability guidelines and considering the number of delete votes so far it's likely pointless to continue this since the outcome will obviously be that the article is deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to mention very few people who don’t play Minecraft are going to know what this thing is. Delete. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No evidence this creation passes GNG. At best redirect and merge to some list of minecraft creatures or such. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.