Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
Theatre articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 13 11 35 61
FL 1 4 35 40
FM 222 222
GA 3 9 18 123 6 159
B 17 67 156 514 52 806
C 37 120 426 2,491 156 3,230
Start 20 110 795 9,142 391 10,458
Stub 3 28 254 6,497 220 7,002
List 1 6 230 324 18 579
Category 1 1 4 7,035 7,041
Disambig 58 58
File 601 601
Portal 5 5
Project 31 31
Redirect 1 1 18 145 1,525 1,690
Template 583 583
NA 7 5 12
Other 199 199
Assessed 84 356 1,913 19,317 10,264 843 32,777
Unassessed 1 43 566 610
Total 84 356 1,914 19,360 10,264 1,409 33,387
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 109,958 Ω = 5.06

I am trying to improve and expand the article on Rimini Protokoll. To my surprise, actually, this seems to be a very contentious issue. As usual I took care to source my amendments and to write as objectively as possible. Still, I meet a lot of resistance. Until now, I have not really understood the problem. Could anyone of you please have a look and perhaps give and informed 3rd opinion [on the article talk page]. Thank you so much! By the way the initial question group vs lable vs collective is nothing I would not negotiate about, but in the meantime a lot of other substantial contributions to the article were just deleted with [little] or [no] explicit justification (by the way [|not I] had been blocked but [the other user] for vandalizing my text, so that was no reason for reverting to his version, on the contrary). I guess it could help to have another perspective on the conflict and be it to understand better the other side...--Olag (talk) 07:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kevin Spacey § Kevin Spacey sexual misconduct allegations spun off into another article without consensus, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Spinixster (trout me!) 00:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bristol Old Vic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply