Wikidata:Property proposal/Texas Historic Sites Atlas ID
Texas Historic Sites Atlas ID
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place
This new Wikidata property for authority control for cultural heritage (Q18618628) would help improve our coverage of the history of Texas (Q1149383). We won't use the single-value constraint (Q19474404) as there is one entry per type of marker or protection issued or monitored by the Texas Historical Commission (Q2397965), regardless about whether or not it comes down to the same structure eventually. Many will have two statements, as they are numerous properties that are both a National Register of Historic Places listed place (Q19558910) and a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark (Q7302881). I don't think you can get more than four at once. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Cultural heritage has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead..
Notified participants of WikiProject United States. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Seem fine! Thank you for the proposal, Thierry Caro. Regards, Ivanhercaz (Talk) 22:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Epìdosis 16:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support @Thierry Caro: You can use single-value constraint (Q19474404), you just to have to add separator (P4155), like for Canadian Register of Historic Places ID (P477). --Fralambert (talk) 13:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Dispe (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done @Thierry Caro, Ivanhercaz, Fralambert, Dispe: --Fralambert (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Fralambert: Pour les entrées à usage multiple, l'usage de qualificatifs est une bonne idée. Mais un meilleur choix que applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) serait criterion used (P1013), non ? Mais encore mieux, en vérité, j'utiliserais bien subject has role (P2868) si j'étais laissé seul avec moi-même. Thierry Caro (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- En fait je suisvait ce que j'avais déjà fait sur NRHP reference number (P649) (dont la séparation est plus lié aux événements) et Canadian Register of Historic Places ID (P477) (qui lui est divisé par statuts patrimoniaux). subject has role (P2868) est sans doute une bonne idée, ceci dit rien n'empêche de mettre les deux, comme pour Presidio County Courthouse (Q7241528) on pourrait conserver celui du « palais de justice » à applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) et déplacer les autres à subject has role (P2868). --Fralambert (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Fralambert: Pour les entrées à usage multiple, l'usage de qualificatifs est une bonne idée. Mais un meilleur choix que applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) serait criterion used (P1013), non ? Mais encore mieux, en vérité, j'utiliserais bien subject has role (P2868) si j'étais laissé seul avec moi-même. Thierry Caro (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]