Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/Lymantria - Wikidata


Article Images
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 8 June 2017 19:18 (UTC)

Dear colleagues,

I would like to nominate Lymantria for bureaucrat. Lymantria is an active member of our community since 2013. He has made 850.000 edits and 40.000 admin actions (2014-). As you can see from his contributions he has a wide range of experience, is thoughtful, friendly, and active. Lymantria has contributed to Wikimedia projects for 10 years, and has over a million global edits. He is admin (2008-) and former bureaucrat (2010-2013) [1] on the Dutch Wikipedia, and admin on Wikimedia Commons (2011-).

The last bureaucrat to step down was Bene* in september 2016 and we currently have 2 bureaucrats. I believe Lymantria would make a great addition to this team. I have worked with Lymantria for nearly 10 years now, and can say he is a pleasure to work with. As such, I would like to recommend Lymantria as bureaucrat for your consideration.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Taketa, for your kind words. I accept the nomination. Lymantria (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support - As nominator - Taketa (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support - Edoderoo (talk) 19:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC) - I know Lymantria from nl-wiki, he will indeed be a good addition![reply]
  3.  Support --Succu (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Rschen7754 00:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support eurodyne (talk) 02:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Brya (talk) 04:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Epìdosis 10:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support A bureaucrat is definitely needed and I cannot see any reason to oppose --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support thanks for being willing to help! ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support ChristianKl (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support, The work is very good. MechQuester (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support - outstanding contributor - Jura1 20:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support - we need active bureaucrats and possibly admins. I don't have a reason to vote against. d1g (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support − Pintoch (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support - PKM (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support If there's a will, I'm happy to support this. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support - Nikki (talk) 12:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support, not that my vote changes things. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Fills a need here. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Stöder -- Innocent bystander (talk) 15:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support -- Nikosguard talk 08:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Of course. I'm glad I'm still on time. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support --NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 10:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support —Jc86035 (talk) 11:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support We should have more than just two bureaucrats.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support Rzuwig► 19:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.