Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orijentolog/Archive - Wikipedia
Article Images
- Orijentolog (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date September 30 2009, 17:00 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Paradoxic (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 161.53.35.105 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.142.146.219 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.142.156.45 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.142.157.143 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Evidence submitted by WIMYV
These users have the same editing pattern. For example, they have the same interests and they have antisemitic comments against Jewish editors. Also, there is an article (Quds Day )that is monitored by admins due to recent edit warring on the article. The monitoring admin has warned the involved parties not to revert the current version, unless they reach consensus. One of involved editor is User:Paradoxic. He disappeared since the admin interfered. However, other users and IPs listed above come out the blue time to time and revert in favor of User:Paradoxic. Probably these socks are used to evade the revert restriction imposed by admins on Quds Day.--WIMYV? (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
I believe the 93.142.x.x users are clearly sockpuppets of Orijentolog and issued a Rangeblock. See brief discussion at Wikipedia:An#Rangeblock_check. Given the behavior, I'd support a CU to see if Paradoxic has logged on in IP ranges that Orijentolog has used. Toddst1 (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CheckUser requests
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by WIMYV? (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Clerk declined Behavioral evidence clearly indicate that User:Paradoxic is the same as the IPs as well as User:Orijentolog. No CU necessary. MuZemike 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
Administrator note User:Paradoxic indefinitely blocked. All other accounts already blocked and tagged. MuZemike 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Report date December 15 2009, 01:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- 93.142.130.88 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.142.184.70 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.143.28.5 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.143.42.110 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 93.143.43.119 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
Evidence submitted by Plot Spoiler
- Original sockpuppet investigation for User:Orijentolog: [1]
See Defending yourself against claims.
CheckUser requests
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Clerk declined – WP:DUCK applies, just as in the previous SPI case. It's virtually the same range as last time. MuZemike 02:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Administrator note 93.143.0.0/18 blocked 1 week. The other range hasn't been touched in a bit. MuZemike 02:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |