Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orijentolog/Archive - Wikipedia


Article Images
Orijentolog (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date September 30 2009, 17:00 (UTC)

edit

Suspected sockpuppets
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

I believe the 93.142.x.x users are clearly sockpuppets of Orijentolog and issued a Rangeblock. See brief discussion at Wikipedia:An#Rangeblock_check. Given the behavior, I'd support a CU to see if Paradoxic has logged on in IP ranges that Orijentolog has used. Toddst1 (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status –   Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by WIMYV? (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC) [reply]


  Clerk declined Behavioral evidence clearly indicate that User:Paradoxic is the same as the IPs as well as User:Orijentolog. No CU necessary. MuZemike 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

  Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

  Administrator note User:Paradoxic indefinitely blocked. All other accounts already blocked and tagged. MuZemike 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date December 15 2009, 01:16 (UTC)

edit

Suspected sockpuppets

edit

See Defending yourself against claims.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status –   Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]


  Clerk declined – WP:DUCK applies, just as in the previous SPI case. It's virtually the same range as last time. MuZemike 02:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

edit

  Administrator note 93.143.0.0/18 blocked 1 week. The other range hasn't been touched in a bit. MuZemike 02:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date May 4 2010, 02:06 (UTC)

edit

Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Uirauna (talk)

IP similar to 93.142.142.22, that has been blocked. Also, edits are very similar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/93.143.35.142 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/93.142.142.22 Uirauna (talk) 02:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

He's not a suspected sockpuppet. He's an obvious sockpuppet. But the IP changes so frequently there's really no point in trying to block them. Discussion and semi-protection as needed are more useful here. Kafziel Complaint Department 02:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

  Clerk note: the IP has been blocked. Not much chance of a rangeblock here I'm afraid and the pages edited seem to be a little too many to be protecting them, however, you may wish to consider WP:RFPP for specific pages should the problems worsen. SpitfireTally-ho! 11:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Suspected sockpuppets

Has made similar tendentious edits[2],[3] to the articles August Uprising, Rape during the occupation of Germany as 76.191.230.178, who is a confirmed[4] sock puppet of User:Orijentolog. --Nug (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can we be sure that both this anon and Orijentolog aren't socks of User:Jacob Peters? They seem to be very similar in their POV and language. --Sander Säde 21:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

edit