Talk:Pakistan - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Article ImagesPakistan is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 29, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Though, the K in Pakistan may stand for Kashmir, according to the person who came up with the name Pakistan, Kashmir was never truly a part of Pakistan. The idea that it was, or is, is purely propaganda. Pakistan is in India, despite constant attempts by Pakistan to occupy it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:680:3080:C587:F489:7BE9:42A9 (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
why is this southern peninsula part of India Shows as claimed territory? It looks very non valid. Kashmir is understandable, but this looks more like a symbolic then a serious claim. 2003:D9:973F:DB63:7632:3B01:AC58:4E91 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- See Annexation of Junagadh, although emphasis comes from more recent politics. CMD (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- this doesn't answer my point.
- Barely any world doesn't even feature this point. On a neutral perspective its barley any feature worth. 84.158.62.180 (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- world map
- 84.158.62.180 (talk) 10:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- It seems to me to belong on the map, though a mention of it needs to be added to and the article. (I've already done so to the caption.) —DocWatson42 (talk) 12:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
How could Pakistan be as influential as Denmark in digital record?
03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 103.245.194.28 (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics has just released their detailed census results, and I think the page’s religious and ethno-linguistic demographics should be updated Hardees123 (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Kindly update the religious statistics in the lead infobox as per the 2023 Pakistani census according to which following is the religious composition of Pakistan:
- Islam 96.3%
- Hinduism 2.2%
- Christianity 1.4%
- Others 0.1%
Source [1]
[Great news for women students and teachers: Pink buses are coming to Islamabad next week!]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
39.34.138.77 (talk) 07:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 10:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
"Pakistan witnessed a fourfold increase in its scientific productivity in the past decade surging from approximately 2,000 articles per year in 2006 to more than 9,000 articles in 2015. Making Pakistan's cited article's higher than the BRIC countries put together."
This seems like a misleading claim to me. Using "making" as the linking word here is misleading (on first reading, it appears according to this claim that 9000 articles is more than what Russia, China, Brazil and India product together). In the source, there's a reference of the article count of pakistan and percentage of cited articles, these two claims are unrelated to each other. 2A02:1810:140B:2C00:AB7A:9D86:48CF:7F41 (talk) 22:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Per MOS:SOB, we should avoid grouping multiple links together to look like a single link. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply