User talk:Al83tito - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
Article Images- Thank you very much, Finnusertop! I very much appreciate your kind gesture. I look forward to continuing to contribute alongside you, and maybe even find opportunities to collaborate, in this shared interest that we have! Best, (talk) user:Al83tito 03:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Your addition to "Grievance Studies" affair has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
- This is a good subject for an article, but we can't have text copied from newspaper articles. Please do expand the article using newly written text. › Mortee talk 07:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Mortee: Thank you for your note, and my apologies. Usually I develop a much more advanced draft before publishing, which would have probably addressed the issues you raised. My apologies for publishing too soon, with that issue not fully addressed from the get-go, based your message. I do want to note a couple of things: I can't recall in detail what the article looked like at the time of your deletion, and hence I cannot quite pinpoint the extent of the copyright issue you raised. I do know that I did not mean to infringe on copyright and I do remember that one thing I was trying to accomplish was to quote some reactions from the protagonists that was reported in an article of the New York Times article (which I believe is allowable in the context of that article, when done sparingly and when there is a good justification for it). I suspect that that is what may have triggered your deletion, and probably I could have done a better job of better identifying the quotes, and at keeping them short. But again, I can't quite pinpoint the problem, and on whether this was a false positive on your end, or a mistake on my end (or a bit of both), because of my inability now to review the edit history of that deleted content. Nevertheless, I take your message as constructive feedback and will work to ensure that my contributions are well written and following the best practices of Wikipedia. Thank you. (talk) user:Al83tito 11:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
- I can't see the deleted version myself, but these were full paragraphs copied without quote marks, not a minor slip. Please don't build articles that way in future. › Mortee talk 20:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Mortee: Thank you for your note, and my apologies. Usually I develop a much more advanced draft before publishing, which would have probably addressed the issues you raised. My apologies for publishing too soon, with that issue not fully addressed from the get-go, based your message. I do want to note a couple of things: I can't recall in detail what the article looked like at the time of your deletion, and hence I cannot quite pinpoint the extent of the copyright issue you raised. I do know that I did not mean to infringe on copyright and I do remember that one thing I was trying to accomplish was to quote some reactions from the protagonists that was reported in an article of the New York Times article (which I believe is allowable in the context of that article, when done sparingly and when there is a good justification for it). I suspect that that is what may have triggered your deletion, and probably I could have done a better job of better identifying the quotes, and at keeping them short. But again, I can't quite pinpoint the problem, and on whether this was a false positive on your end, or a mistake on my end (or a bit of both), because of my inability now to review the edit history of that deleted content. Nevertheless, I take your message as constructive feedback and will work to ensure that my contributions are well written and following the best practices of Wikipedia. Thank you. (talk) user:Al83tito 11:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi, based on your recent edit summary, I forgot to ping you here please join the discussion and share your thoughts. DBigXrayᗙ 10:11, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Al83tito. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Al83tito. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Participation:
This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
At 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100!
A demo wiki is up and running!
You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.
And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.
- I am delighted to invite you to the 2019 Wikipedia Day party at Stanford, which will be held on Tuesday, January 15, 2019, at 5:00-8:30pm.
- There will be pizza, cake, and refreshments; both newcomers and experienced Wikimedians are welcome! We will have a beginner track with tutorials, and an advanced track with presentations, lightning talks, and tips and tricks. Admission is free, and you do NOT have to be a Stanford University student to attend.
See you soon! All the best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c)
The article Adventure Classic Gaming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:WEBCRIT. The website has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domeditrix (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 2A02:AB88:2CBC:280:9C95:2F33:DBF9:F89 -- 2A02:AB88:2CBC:280:9C95:2F33:DBF9:F89 (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 21 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea for issues which need to be addressed. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MJL -- MJL (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
On 22 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Music of Grim Fandango, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music of Grim Fandango is considered one of the best early examples of adaptive music systems in video gaming, heralding the era of cinematic experiences in gameplay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Music of Grim Fandango. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Music of Grim Fandango), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
- I am delighted to invite you to the SPIE Photonics West 2020 edit-a-thon, at Park Central Hotel (Franciscan I, 3rd Level / 50 Third Street / San Francisco, California), on Sunday, February 2, 2020, at 5:00-7:00pm.
- Newcomers and experienced Wikimedians are welcome to participate alongside SPIE conference attendees. Admission is free. Training will be provided.
- Details and sign-in here
See you soon! All the best, --Rosiestep (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Hello! Your submission of Rights of nature at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I moved the abandoned User:Draftingpage36/sandbox to User:Al83tito/Kelly Sims Gallagher as you appeared to be the editor who had made it. You may wish to complete it as an article, move it to Draft space, or tag it for deletion (using {{db-author}}) if you don't think a separate article is justified after all. – Fayenatic London 21:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Bon dia, Molt de goig de "conéixer-te"... Ai, em sap molt de greu. A priori (si ho he entés bé) sí que s'hauria d'enregistrar. Espere que ho faré bé. Una abraçada ben bona! Cuida't bé, sobretot amb aquest maleït virus i la calor si en tens on vius (ací ens està ofegant d'ençà d'ahir...). Fins ben prompte! Claudi/Capsot (talk) 12:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Al38tito!
I'm a PhD student at UCL, studying the way knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. Would you be happy to talk about your experience as an editor? If you wish to know more about my project, you can look up my userpage, and/or ask questions. Thanks! ElenaFalco (talk) 10:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have nominated StarCraft (video game) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 04:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
Hi Al83tito! That's a great question. I don't know of anyone planning in-person meetups or WikiSalons right now, but I've heard of other people interested in this too. If you haven't already joined the Bay Area mailing list, I'd suggest subscribing to it — that's where I look for announcements of new events, and if I organize an event, I'll post it there. I've thought about organizing a downtown Oakland photowalk similar to my San Francisco Financial District photowalk in 2017, since that could be entirely outdoors, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Dreamyshade (talk) 20:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something
- News and notes: Information considered harmful
- In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap
- Op-Ed: The "recession" affair
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
- Community view: Youth culture and notability
- Opinion: Criminals among us
- Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement
- Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country
- Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us
- Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists
- Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot
- On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
- Essay: How to research an image
- Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed
- Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia
- Gallery: A backstage pass
- From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened
Hi!
Wikimania is happening and hopefully you're enjoying the sessions. While it's fairly last minute, you're warmly invited to participate in the local Wikimania-themed meetup in the Wikimedia Foundation office this Friday (tomorrow!). You will have to register in advance, but we would love to see more people from the WikiSalon community participate! For more information and registration, please check out meta:Wikimania 2022/San Francisco Meetup.
The event will involve hacking, teaching, learning, and celebrating and we'll have snacks. We will have the opportunity to watch live sessions at Wikimania together in the afternoon. The rest of the day we'll have opportunity to participate in the hackathon, and we may have some on-demand workshops/learning sessions.
In case we run out of space, it's first-come-first-serve so let us know soon! Hope to see you there.
(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here)
On behalf of the Bay Area Wiki Salon team and Bittakea, Effeietsanders
- From the team: A new goose on the roost
- News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment
- Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove
- Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com
- Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?
- Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Elaine Marley has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 12:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Hegde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Al83tito! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aplucas0703 was:
This article goes on very long tangents explaining his research. There is no reason to get that detailed. Such research is more useful on Wikipedia pages about the subject the research was over, not on the page of who conducted the research except for extremely brief descriptions. After this is fixed, leaving a comment on your own submission to point out which sources you think best show notability of the subject, as it may speed up a future approval.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Hegde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Thanks for uploading File:Ayoxxa Biosystems logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Al83tito. Thank you for your work on Sung-Yoon Lee bibliography. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Al83tito. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deepak Hegde".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your edit to American Translators Association has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply