User talk:Guitarmike612 - Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2002 MTV Movie Awards, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2002 MTV Movie Awards was changed by Guitarmike612 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85837 on 2012-04-02T02:07:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent editing history at Falling Down shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. It is time for you to use the talk page to explain your edits; stop edit-warring. RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 02:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Big does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 02:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Big, you may be blocked from editing. A viewing of the film does not support your interpretation, which you have made five attempts to insert into the article. Please stop this behavior. An edit war over this is disruptive. Your edit has been reverted repeatedly by multiple editors. If you believe your edit is correct, use the article's talk page to discuss it, per WP:BRD, and seek consensus for the edit. Hertz1888 (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sling Blade. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Zagalejo^^^ 04:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The list is available here; I don't see anything about Sling Blade. Zagalejo^^^ 04:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Angel Penis is feeling or mood that can be characterized as being euphoric or docile. It means complete relaxation or joy. One can feel angel is a variety of ways. For example, "I did really well on that Spanish test that I thought I was going to fail. I feel more than happy, I feel angel penis" It is a feeling that one feels when accomplishing an amazing feet and then looking back on the progress.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarmike612 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 22 March 2013‎ (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Winter Hill Gang

added links pointing to Kevin O'Neill, Joe McDonald, Bobby O'Connor, Paul Moore and John Hurley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Winter Hill Gang does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Winter Hill Gang. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Vrac. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Winter Hill Gang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 04:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:BLP is Wikipedia's policy for articles on living people. Please take a look, especially at the crime section. Naming someone as a member of a gang is a potentially libelous activity and as such needs a citation to a solid reliable source that states it as fact. Also the articles cited need to actually back up what is being written in the Wikipedia article which was not the case with Patrick Linskey. Vrac (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of fatal alligator attacks in the United States page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Guitarmike612,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joe McDonald (mobster) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe McDonald (mobster), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italian, Irish and Roger Wheeler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic (1997 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Along Came Polly, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 00:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Notting Hill (film). General Ization ^Talk 00:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply