User talk:Ivebeenhacked - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

N1015X_Air_Tahiti_Nui_Boeing_787-9_Dreamliner_5

  • Hello! You are welcome to say whatever you have to! Remember to keep cool.

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

Getting help

How you can help

 

Hello, CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! 
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Added name! CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 18:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Great! Happy editing! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm User:Skip6546. An edit you recently made to East Coast Jets Flight 81 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. User:Skip6546 (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wait... why does "your talk page" link to this page? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
but why no Censored messages? Skip6546 (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:NOTCENSORED. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
but why not do you without censored? Skip6546 (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Could you clarify what you're trying to say? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
You see, in this Wikipedia page, WP:NOTCENSORED, the name and the article clarify that usually articles shouldn't be censored. I've even asked people on the Wikipedia:Teahouse and all of them said the same thing. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 16:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
no I'm going to report called disruptive editing Skip6546 (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're gonna report me for doing something correctly? CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
i said everyone I can stupid user I'm going to report! Skip6546 (talk) 02:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
You do you. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I saw your message on my talk page. The edit you reverted was not a test, it was a correction based on the final report on the accident (check page 2, or 7 in the pdf), which only says there were 6 causalities on the ground. I applied this correction to as many other articles as I could find as well. ThatFlyingSquid (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that revert. I was looking at the wrong sources. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

My understanding is that it is common practice across multiple plane crash-related articles to use such notations where the mortality and injury counts change after the crash. Removing them could be disruptive editing. Ellenor2000 (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

How quickly people die doesn't change the ultimate number of people dying. It doesn't change history does it? Therefore, its redundant stating the "initially X" notations. It says all of this in here, "to summarize" info. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just wanted to say that because I now know that I (you too), are in violation of WP:RR3, I will not be reverting until tomorrow. Fadedreality556 (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dude I literally have more evidence than you and I proved it. You have an unreliable preliminary report site. Just stop your edits dude. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Correction, aircraft info on a preliminary report isn't unreliable. Also no. Fadedreality556 (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:76.171.193.254 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 06:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'll do better! CreatorMH (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine reported by User:Seawolf35 (Result: ). Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 15:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The accident was due to turbulences but the 6000 ft loss happened 15 minutes later and was a normal descent Df (talk) 02:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

N767BA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, sir! CreatorMH (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
You might want to create your own sandbox in your own userspace so you can avoid edit summaries like these [1] [2]. Just a thought. GSK (talk • edits) 06:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry! I'm a slow learner. CreatorMH (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Airlines Flight 331, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

EasyJet
added a link pointing to Hijacked
Pan Am Flight 799
added a link pointing to Khánh Hòa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EasyJet Flight 6074, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyJet Flight 6074 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

asn.flightsafety.org has been used multiple times as only source for each case. Kindly get reliable sources with in-depth coverage for each case. Regarding on the topic issue, it needs to be discussed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 11:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you please name your favourite(fav) aircraft and fav airline? BuddyHeigh (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Favorite aircraft is the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and favorite airline is Qatar Airways. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You must have seen all-time fav aircraft being the Boeing 747. Since I was a child, I had fascination in the aircraft. I first flew in it with Air India in 1986. After that, I flew in it at least 5-6 times. And the most recent one was in 2022, when I rode with Lufthansa, and their blend of classic seating and modernized seating made it my fav airline. BuddyHeigh (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, the Boeing 747 (Boeing 747-800 specifically) is my Top Five favorite aircraft. The 747 really is incredible. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I remember the Maharaja grand interiors inside the jumbo. Additionally, I got a spot for t-tails like the Boeing 717 and McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Series. For regional flyers, I'll go for the Cessna 208B Caravan. From good ol' Boeing, I have the spot for the 747, 767 and 777. Fokkers like Friend and Fellowship also hold a place. From Airbus, the A300, 320-200s,330neo and the 380 are my favourites.The British Concorde is unforgettable. Lockheeds like L-1011 TriStars and L-188 Electras are in my list. I also like McDonnell Douglas' DC-9, DC-10-30, MD-11, MD-80 Series and MD-90 Series. I also have a like for Russo-Soviet aircraft like Ilyushin Il-62 and Il-96, Tupelov Tu-134, Tu-154, Tu-204 and Tu-214 and Yakovlev Yak-42, Yak-82 and MC-21. BuddyHeigh (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Those are all amazing and unforgettable aircraft you've named there. Basically named Aviation History since the 70s and I like it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. This means a lot to me. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 02:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. Thank you for created useful articles. And if possible, can you create "2000 Tehran ruway disaster" ( A collision between Iran Air Force C-130 and Iran Air A300, all 8 people on C-130 died ). Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Tô Ngọc Khang. I was thinking of that disaster but there is a serious lack of citations. I might consider creating it but I need time thinking about it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 08:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Tô Ngọc Khang. If you want, you should create a draft about it called the "2000 Tehran airport disaster" since the collision didn't take place on the runway and I might help you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 08:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Tô Ngọc Khang. 2000 Tehran airport disaster. You should've created a draft by using WP:Article Wizard. It would've been much simpler to edit and submit the page to the live feed. You already put the page on live. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 09:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2000_Tehran_airport_disaster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:USAir_Flight_499 Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is a source that the plane had been owned by Korean Air and was leased to Air India. I am adding the link for your reference as this can be used as a citation.[1]. Refer this one as well - https://www.airhistory.net/photo/410130/VT-EVJ. Nuts5070 (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't use airfleets.net. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Leave me alone JKSX (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are disrupting Wikipedia. Please stop. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, I'm not. JKSX (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
There was absolutely no need to change the word "accident" to "crash". Both occurrences were accidents. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
You've already been explained twice by me and you kept reverting the edit. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
But leave me alone and stop reverting my edits JKSX (talk) 18:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Again, there was absolutely no need to change the word "accident" without good reasoning. That's called disruptive editing. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, that's not. JKSX (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
How is it not? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because JKSX (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Look, the only thing I gotta say is that you are disrupting Wikipedia. Please stop Edit warring. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, I'm not. JKSX (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. fanfanboy (block) 19:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. I know you created some articles of prototpye aircraft, as B-HNL, N767BA... If so, can you create N708PA article (the prototype of Boeing 707) ? Thank you ! Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Tô Ngọc Khang. I'll see if I get the time. I'll first have to look for the sources. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 13:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi JMSNXYZ (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JMSNXYZ. Hello there. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ "Boeing 747 MSN 24199".