User talk:Smoothcheeks - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
An article you recently created, Dr Gábor Böröndi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 08:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
A tag has been placed on István Kriston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article István Kriston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/István Kriston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with István Kriston. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
- PS: Just so you're aware, removing AfD templates is not only against the rules, it's also pointless, as the AfD discussion will carry on regardless, and a bot will automatically replace the removed template. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to István Kriston, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 06:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at István Kriston, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn (talk) 06:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at István Kriston. I tried to explain nicely, but you persist, leaving me with no option but to issue the final warning. Please let the AfD template stay, or risk sanctions. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
An article you recently created, Csongrád County Assembly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The brief statements of politicians arriving for Kötcse picnic are not authoritative in this question, which are in line with current political interests. The analyses of academic journals, political science are reliable, instead. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Smoothcheeks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Csongrád County Assembly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Smoothcheeks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Csongrád County Assembly".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Gyula Gömbös, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
An article you recently created, Máté Kanász-Nagy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
An article you recently created, 1861 Hungarian parliamentary election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). In addition, the content of the page only appears to be templates and contains no prose. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo (talk - contribs) 08:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fifth Orbán Government, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifth Orbán Government until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Primary notability concern not addressed. Sources do not indicate that there was a "first republic", or that the republic ceased to exist in 1994.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Republic of South Africa (1961–1994) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Dear @Greenman,
- thank you for notifying me about the issue.
- Best, Smoothcheeks (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Smoothcheeks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply |
Hi! As I have seen, you created all Hungarian county council/assembly pages, however, naming is inconsistent, as all of them are 'közgyűlés' in Hungarian, so no distinction. Probably they should be re-edited to either ASSEMBLY or COUNCIL. I hope you would not mind if I worked on it. Regards, Emcfsv (talk) 11:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply