User talk:Staberinde - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
AmakuruThe muffin is not subtle 00:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks Gerda, much appreciated!--Staberinde (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- A year ago, you were recipient no. 2147 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
— Wug·a·po·des 03:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Your articles would be most welcome at! Keep up the great work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Your submission of Aleksander Jaakson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dahn (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Re RussiaSpinney Hill (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC) . I agree on the flag. Still not convinced on the nameReply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanno Grossschmidt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanno Grossschmidt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Good evening, from my reading of the talk page, you seemed to express interest in having another RfC determine consensus view for their views. I would like to notify you that I have started an RfC on the topic. Yours, Szmenderowiecki (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Szmenderowiecki (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I have no experience with DYK nominations. I guess you are following a formal procedure for the nomination of the page on Tsadkan Gebretensae? Anything that I can do to support it? Rastakwere (talk) 04:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Rastakwere: It should be pretty simple at this point, someone will review it (may take time), and if they have any issues/questions then those need to be addressed. I am pretty sure I can handle any questions that may be asked, although obviously you are are welcome to participate too. I did move your alternative hook wording into main nomination for overall better readability, and as second one was just wikilink addition I simply added that link into original hook proposal.--Staberinde (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, i am here for a recent edit who you made at the page battle of friedland, the question is do you have a source or an explanation of why Saxony contributed troops to the battle? If so it will be much apreciated. Cordially regards.Nuevousuario1011 (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Nuevousuario1011: Added source to the article.--Staberinde (talk) 07:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Thankyou very much.Nuevousuario1011 (talk) 16:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
On 25 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tsadkan Gebretensae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tsadkan Gebretensae, one of the top commanders of Tigray forces in the conflict against the Ethiopian government, previously served as chief of staff of the Ethiopian National Defense Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tsadkan Gebretensae. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tsadkan Gebretensae), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I have started a discussion in which you may care to comment at [[1]] Cheers Elinruby (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
| Three years! |
|---|
Hi, Staberinde. When adding a new discussion at a Talk page with multiple paragraphs, please use one blank line between paragraphs per WP:Talk#Layout, not double break-tags, as occurred here. If there's ever a situation which requires you to use one, the unterminated break tag (<br>) breaks syntax highlighting, so please use either the terminated version <br />, or the replacement template {{br}} which is shorter and does the same thing. Thanks Mathglot (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Will keep in mind, thanks.--Staberinde (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
On 11 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Lill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Estonian minister of war Paul Lill resigned in 1939, citing the unacceptable conditions of the Bases Treaty with the Soviet Union? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Lill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paul Lill), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
In a recent edit summary for the Philippine–American War article here, you said, "1. we dont use newspapers published at the time to write about more than century old conflicts, historians do exist. 2. also even if better source existed, usage of "supporters" has been deprecated by community decision anyway". Could you point me towards discussions where this was established and/or to guidelines where these points are stated? Also, please see this discussion section that I've just added to that article talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I replied at Talk:Philippine–American War.-- Staberinde (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply