Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone 6 - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sorry, I must have been logged out when I was editing at my workplace. Anyways, I believe this article should be deleted as it contains no references and is based on pure speculation, which constitutes WP:CRYSTALBALL. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 04:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 27. Snotbot t • c » 04:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:CRYSTAL and/or WP:TOOSOON spectacularly. Anyone vaguely familiar with Apple will realize that the next iPhone may not even BE the iPhone 6... There's not a single reference in this article, and it's uncategorised... in fact, I'm staggered it even existed as a redirect in the first place, let alone one created in 2011! The article was changed from the redirect by an IP, was reverted to a redirect, then re-reverted to the IP's change by a different IP - so bin this, it's not a valid redirect link, and SALT it for goodness' sake. Lukeno94 (talk) 11:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article fails WP:CRYSTAL. Who knows what Apple will choose to call the next iPhone? Delete. Majoreditor (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:CRYSTAL PianoDan (talk) 15:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Autarch (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL JayJay^{Talk to me} 20:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely unsourced. For all we know, it could be called iPhone 5S. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.