Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 24 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Early close as keep - nominator has withdrawn their nomination. Mike Peel 18:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was a template apparantly designed for use in one article (List of Israeli films). It wasn't particularly useful, as it provided only one link to a page that is linked to elsewhere in the article. I think that its fitting to be deleted. — -ReuvenkT C 14:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, since the two articles can be linked via more common means: prose, See Also sections, or {{See also}}/{{Main}}. It does look pretty, but (per the nomination) it's not that useful. GracenotesT § 19:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree completely with Gracenotes - the creator obviously has a nice eye visually - but it's just obviously not a useful template.--danielfolsom 21:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It was created for visual and presentation purposes but also ready for when the list expands. I believe there are enough films to make it eventually appropriate to split by decade. Everybody please see Template:Japanfilmlist for the eventual purpose idea. A template to connect to List of Israeli films:1990s etc. However this needs a great deal of devleopment which I am willing to help with if needs be If I can add some more things like List of Israeli actors or something related this might make it more worthy don't you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 17:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Spoko with Sir Blofeld - he's going to work on the article a bit more, which will hopefully show a need for this template. I take back my nomination, for now. -ReuvenkT C 18:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Void. Like the CfD discussion, this will be much easier to decide once we know how many articles we're dealing with. Let the AfDs play-out. Duplicating that discussion here is not helpful. ×Meegs 15:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly empty template. Non-redlink articles created by SPA/COI account and nominated for deletion/merger. Dbromage [Talk] 11:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - useless, spammy template. MER-C 11:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom--Hu12 12:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong keep This whole group of related nominations is unresearched and a manifestation of systemic bias. The SK Group is a $75.8 billion entity ranked 98th on the Fortune Global 500, making it larger than many American groups with bucketfuls of articles. NB. I am not Korean and had never heard of this company until today, so please don't accuse me of bias. Postlebury 13:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above and discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Golfcam 14:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 02:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The template only contain links to 2 articles and references to 2 other templates. I migrated the links to one of those templates, so it's no longer needed. — 69.182.52.67 04:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, template is subsumed by {{Valve games}} (which is transcluded on the template). GracenotesT § 19:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Gracenotes. -Joshuapaquin 20:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not enough links to stand on it's own, redirect to Template:Valve games barring the latter's deletion --danielfolsom 21:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obsolete per above. Carlosguitar 08:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.