Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 11 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. However, it looks like there could be consensus to replace with a Template:Marvel's Netflix television series navbox if that were proposed instead. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe with hardly any content worthwhile for a separate temp. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as I think there are enough dedicated articles (series, three seasons, character list) to justify this template, plus relevant related articles. Just because all of these links can be found on the main MCU navbox doesn't mean there isn't value in having a separate template. If someone is specifically interested in the Jessica Jones topic I don't think they should have to go looking for all of the related articles when it is standard to put all of those together in a series template. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you realise there is also {{Jessica Jones}}? --woodensuperman 14:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Not everything needs a separate template, especially when there are other templates they can easily fall under. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as substantial duplication of {{Jessica Jones}} and {{Marvel Cinematic Universe}} per nom. --woodensuperman 14:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Has enough links to justify a standalone navbox. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Yes there are enough links per WP:NENAN to justify a navbox, but looking at those links, they don't add additional material not found if the larger MCU navbox or others on this topic. Unlike other MCU TV series ones, where the individual episodes are linked because they are not appropriate to be included in the larger MCU navbox. And the fact that the character article isn't even the lead, that takes some weight away from that area to consider it to keep. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into a new Template:Marvel's Netflix television series, along with others nominated in this area. BD2412 T 02:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Template:Marvel's Netflix television series alongside others under parent Marvel's Netflix television series. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there is additional discussion regarding this and the similarly nominated templates happening at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Marvel Cinematic Universe task force#Marvel Television series templates. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per InfiniteNexus. Ducatcolge (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per my previous relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Template:Marvel's Netflix television series per above. -- ZooBlazertalk 20:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note the other templates related to this one that would be relevant to the new template proposed all closed as "no consensus". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Team was wound-up at the conclusion of the 2022/23 season due to financial problems. As they no longer complete a current squad template is no longer required. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can the focus of the template be changed, to focus on the history rather than the current season, as the article title would imply? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]- That isn’t typically done, historical squad templates are usually only for specific tournaments such as British Lions or Rugby World Cup. I suppose it could be kept as “final season” but as players move on, the template would be removed from their page and replaced with their current squad, so it eventually faces being orphaned.
- RodneyParadeWanderer (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So would you say keep for now? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Historic templates are only kept for Lions/Barbarians sides as RPW states, World Cup squads, and medal winning sides. We don't keep historic templates for each season. The templates are designed to allow easy access and links between players, and as RPW states, if these templates aren't used in player articles, then what benefit does it have? Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I would say delete
- RodneyParadeWanderer (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 05:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRUFT template created by block-evading user. Four transclusions. Painting17 (talk) 13:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep potentially useful for navigation. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There are only three links in the tree: Indiana Jones, his dad, and his wife. Most of the entries in this template were minor roles in The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles and can be found at List of Indiana Jones characters. Painting17 (talk) 14:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per InfiniteNexus. Ducatcolge (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If it is kept it should be moved to "Indiana Jones family tree", Jones is a very common name, there are probably dozens of more notable "Jones families".★Trekker (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. We already have Template:Indiana Jones which links the four characters with articles (Indiana Jones, Marion Ravenwood, Sallah, Henry Jones Sr.). This would be like a template with a majority of redirects back to the list of characters article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, excessive to include this in every character article. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Chembox SDBS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Chembox SDBS/format (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused stale WIP templates by an editor who’s been site banned. Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This was created as part of the discussion now at WT:WikiProject Chemistry/Archive 53#Linking Chembox to spectroscopic data on the AITS database, in response to a suggestion by Project Osprey and supported by myself and Graeme Bartlett. I doubt that the proposal will ever be implemented as there are other sources of such information but I don't think the template should be deleted just because the person who created it is site banned. I'd like to alert the others I mentioned so they can add their views.
- Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- That isn't the reason. The reason is that aside from those edits on the day it was created, no work has been done in over 5 months. That's a clear sign it's been abandoned. The fact that the only editor working on it was site banned just means that that they won't be returning to work on it. Gonnym (talk) 21:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Michael D. Turnbull: If you think it could be useful, could it be moved to draft while you work on it? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Delete I have no expertise in creating templates and given that the other editors I mentioned have not commented, I'm happy to see it removed.
- Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).