Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Fralambert - Wikidata

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 06:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 29 February 2020 01:52 (UTC)

• Fralambert (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

1.  Support --Thibaut (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2.  Support Trusted user. Good job as sysop on frwiki as far as I know. Pamputt (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Support — Koreller (talk) 11:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Support Trusted user --GrandCelinien (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Support Super! --Simon Villeneuve (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Support —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Support --Minorax (talk) 12:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Support — Envlh (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Support I know him as an efficient user and sysop on frwiki. It will be the same of Wikidata. --Arcyon37 (talk) 12:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
10.  Support --Alaa :)..! 13:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 14:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
12.  Support --Kostas20142 (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Support Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 15:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
14.  Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
15.  Support --DannyS712 (talk) 18:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support Mike Peel (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Leaning support —Eihel (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Support --BRP ^ever 23:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
19.  Support Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 01:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
20.  Neutral as I'm finding it unclear from the response to Eihel's query below whether Fralambert would do more than just work with deletions and French-speaking community matters (see, for example, how Mike Peel noted in his RfA in response to Esteban's query that he was open to picking up new tasks beyond just the ones mentioned). Mahir256 (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
21.  Neutral I respect your great work for Wikidata and Wikipedia but I've never seen you before. Or I can't remember. In particular, I can't remember your activity in the page of request for deletions - you're just planning to be active there. I have no exact opinion. --Wolverène (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
22.  Support.-- H^akan·IST 15:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Support obviously, and it especially important to have admins on other channel like Discord. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
24.  Support I am only editing Wikidata for the last few months, but I have already seen Fralambert here and there. Good luck! Nadzik (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
25.  Support Ayack (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
26.  Support tireless contributor to Wikidata. If he isn't known to English speaking/writing contributors, it's probably because he posts to the French project chat or is busy adding content. --- Jura 08:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
27.  Support --Benoît (discussion) 12:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
28.  Support --Epìdosis 14:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
29.  Weak support. From the questions, I think Fralambert will make a good Wikidata admin for the French-speaking community, but I should remind him (and everyone else who participates in off-wiki discussions about Wikimedia sites) that off-wiki discussions should never override on-wiki decision making. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikidata needs administrators, but your argument puzzles me. Are you talking about [1]? If so, this channel cannot be used as a single criterion of an application as administrator. Your number of contributions indicates to me to write beforehand here before issuing an opinion. I need more "substance". —Eihel (talk) 19:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was talking about this Discord Channel. I don't think I will be really active un the Administrator noticeboard, since I am not really active on this point on frwiki. On frwiki I use most my admin right for Speedy delete, renaming and masking some copyright violations, so I don't thing this will be to much difference here. --Fralambert (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• {{Support}} Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 01:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi @Masumrezarock100: The Wikidata community is happy to welcome an additional contributor. But with 97 non-automated contributions at the start of this application, you cannot claim that your vote be counted. You only have 99 non-automated changes at this time. I move your opinion in this section because the rest of the community can appreciate your opinion. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Eihel, Masumrezarock100: Am I right to think that, now that Masum has commented on these elections and got his 100th non-automated edit as a result, he may vote in future elections? Deryck Chan (talk) 11:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Deryck Chan: Exactly, no. Because, at this time, he did not make any additional modification meeting the criterion, therefore technically, if he waits to make the next modification on a vote of administrator, he will not have made his 100th non-automated edition before the start of the vote. Maybe if he writes "Hello Deryck Chan" and "Hello Eihel"… —Eihel (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Masumrezarock100, Deryck Chan: Apparently the problem has just ended: [2] —Eihel (talk) 15:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  After an update on XTools, it appears that @Masumrezarock100: has 122 non-automated edits. I restore the vote to the right place. Sorry for the inconvenience. For information: @Fralambert: —Eihel (talk) 16:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• What are your thoughts on w:Wikipedia:Off-wiki policy discussion? --- Jura 08:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I think that even if you found a compromise off-wiki, it would be hard to point to a third person that you reached this compromise. Note that on Wikidata, off-wiki discussion seem to have some potential for teaching how Wikidata work. --Fralambert (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.